in the Overseas, where the traditional right and 'very strong, there' was a great achievement of PD. And even 'the first party in the House with 32.7% before the PDL 31%. It keeps all the seats of the past elections in which the CDL to another, by an act of presumption, we introduce 'uniform. A result like that and 'depended largely on the activities of the democratic circles and territorial on-line, born spontaneously after the Constituent Assembly last October, have promoted a great campaign full of enthusiasm. This result, and 'should be remembered, depends much by the fact that voters abroad are not intortati every single day from the media power of Berlusconi. In Italy we have lost the election. The result of 33% and 'good as an affirmation of the party. However, it can be a force for reform that is a candidate to govern the country. And that 'what matters most. Weighs heavily the distance of the other coalition: more than 9 percentage points! And what I mean. And our 'politically anomalous in a country where up to tangentopoli DC has ruled for 40 years continuously. Subsequently, the left has won twice thanks to a two-party system and a former Democrat, Romano Prodi. So in a country historically anti-left majority in the matches between the left parties have always lost, however, between the coalitions there 'was an alternative. I would note that in all two-party system in the world in the last 30 years is not 'never seen a gap of more than 5 points between the sides. In addition to the left we have already taken all possible, while at the center we have not even drained a consensus. And the votes are votes UDC frozen ready if necessary for the PDL. We knew we could pay a price for change. but nobody thought it was so 'high. E 'politically risky to give back to a victory so Berlusconi' net. The entity is that all observers were talking, even to the right of a Senate shaky. With 42 senators, with this law! But we're kidding? A majority so 'wide there' was never in the history of the Republic. So 'it also jeopardizes the future action of PD. First the role that the party will have on the reforms, because we risk being mere spectators. Berlusconi Well we know it. Dropped and the Bicameral and 'the author of porcellum. And which has the already denied a room. With the league so 'strong semi-presidentialism him to forget. And I also believe that this is not easy to change the electoral law that fits perfectly in the center-right. When should lose draw win and when it should do 'coat! Then, even if it transpires, this defeat has put Veltroni's leadership and credibility of the Democratic Party as a future force of government. It 's not even been a question of lack of time. And in any case not 'decisive to explain what' s happened. Berlusconi won in '94 with a very short time. Okay the Prodi government has weighed, but what about the Berlusconi government 2001-2006. It was very badly received in the same way. I think the policy of Veltroni was right. The results showed that the PD there 'was a lack of credibility. If the message is right but does not reach the voters, maybe the mistake was in carrying the message? I think not. Veltroni, as I wrote, it remains one of the most capable leader of the Italian political history and is' an exceptional comunicatore. L’errore a mio avviso e’ stato il target, il segmento elettorale a cui parlare. Gli argomenti ottimi e credibili di Veltroni, veicolati con un linguaggio immaginifico dal grande senso civico, hanno scaldato veramente i cuori della gente. Ma solo di un 1/3 degli italiani e sono stati ignorati dal resto. L'errore e' stato considerare la maggioranza degli italiani di centro come dei moderati che prediligono i toni pacati e sereni. Le vicende politiche lo dicono almeno da 15 anni. Infatti Berlusconi si professa moderato ma nelle azioni e nel linguaggio che usa non lo e' affatto. E' un populista. Ai "cosiddetti" moderati italiani evidentemente piace anche veder strappare i programmi, attaccare le istituzioni, parlare di successi con le donne, evade the rules. The average Italian and 'a smart, and is' full of the "amoral familism" (I refer you to wikipedia) more typical of the companies' southern Italy not only individualistic. Arrival to say that Berlusconi largely makes us', because this thing did happen on the fly and we still do not. In Italy, if not substance, and 'a normal country politically and' moderate because the class is not 'that. This' was a mistake in my opinion. Certainly not that I really want to act like Berlusconi Veltroni, but 'that resets the necessary political action bearing in mind this scenario and that this segment electoral dialogues with at least marginally. Otherwise the votes to get us forget them. As far as I'm concerned I will not give and I will work immediately. Because I believed and believe in it, otherwise I would not be so 'critical and detailed. However, the 2013 seems far away.
The argument is simply the opinion of a militant and does not reflect the line of the Democratic Party but simply uses the political forum.
0 comments:
Post a Comment