Compromises
0:05 ... glued to the PC, to keep me updated on these damned elections seconds. But I will not cover elections. In recent days I've had moments that I would not repeat, but that opened my eyes. Reasoning about interpersonal relationships, I realized how they are regulated primarily by compromise. Two different characters tend to struggle and to find a meeting point of needing a compromise, one of the other two approaches and look for a bridge that can tie them in thought. Now the question is: "When a compromise is unacceptable?" This time the answer mi è arrivata più in fretta del solito e me ne compiaccio. Per me,un compromesso è incettabile,quando arriva a minare i miei ideali,quando esso mi porta a fare scelte che normalmente non farei.Rinunciare a qualcosa che fa parte del mio interiore solo per trovare un accordo con qualcuno che magari non si è sforzato mai abbastanza per venire a sua volta incontro a me...allora si! Questo non mi va bene. Non ho mai fatto grandi compromessi, ma nell'ultimo periodo mi sono sforzata per cercare di capire e avvicinarmi ad un mondo nuovo. Sento però,che la mia individualità è stata minacciata, sento che i miei ideali e valori sono stati accantonati per un bene che non era equilibrato. Col senno di poi mi chiedo se non avrei dovuto porre le mie condizioni from the start instead of blindly indulge a thought that I belonged. Surely, the thing that I did was not revealed for what they are, exposing my thoughts, thus giving a free rein to a review, rate and inaccurate. Finally, it is fair to compromise to reach a ratio of higher quality, but is also critical to expose their way of living and seeing life without charges, of course, allowing those in front of you to get a correct idea of \u200b\u200bwho We, thus excluding the possibility of being left with the head and foot problems that really could have been avoided from the outset.
Monday, June 8, 2009
Friday, June 5, 2009
Vote Of Thanks For A Wedding
Go and vote
voter turnout in European elections and 'historically low in Italy. However, tomorrow and Sunday, the popular vote will be significant also and mainly for domestic politics. another pro-referendum against Berlusconi. index of real (not surveys) not so much to the liking of the work of government, but its most important figure, discussed and extremist. the father-master, as a monarch.
here in the UK, the European elections were held yesterday and already it seems that the current government was heavily defeated. also overwhelmed by the scandal over inflated expense claims by MPs. controversy that Italians smile. British boys ask me how it is possible that Berlusconi could only stand for election with: national control of information, Alfano, Mills proved corruption, frequented by minors. I say that not only in Italy and 'presentable, but his coalition is likely to double that of rivals. is Once is not enough to mention the voting power of the media or the traditional anti-left Italian, I have to say that the majority of Italians (my constituents) like the authoritarian man, only to command, which clears the parliamentary and democratic systems of party and that is adored because cunning, amoral and wastes females, which might even be his daughters but nieces. here in this part of the Italians better not talk, do not understand.
I turn to the many people who have seized with enthusiasm and hope the experience of PD. attempt to rejuvenate the policy and make it more 'democratic, just and secular. and have been disappointed because they had high expectations. the seed democratic, 'but still there is not' easy to grow and reap the benefits. to rejuvenate the party apparatus is consensus and a positive election result. otherwise it is divided again over power and even bigger (if possible) to Berlusconi. need the help, patience and contribution of all. moreover, even the most critical, the "hard-core" can not fail to recognize as an attempt by the party late but remains by far the best example of good policy in Italy. not 'this time of the protest vote or abstention from disappointment, because it would give carte blanche to Berlusconi, who for me, and not just' a bad politician but ' too dangerous. and how to say those who know him well but he is not 'an employee (a few people in Italy can boast of these two qualities together) is not well.
not vote for him is not enough time, and 'necessary votargli against .
history teaches us that if the democratic progress, and civic and civil 'unavoidable,' but you can speed up or delay it. well, tomorrow assecondiamolo with one vote.
ps to be honest the British boys a few days ago I also asked (laughing): "but not to vote must do berlusconi? hard to organize feasts? "
I fear that the majority of Italians, accustomed believer and if necessary, will once again shrugged.
here in the UK, the European elections were held yesterday and already it seems that the current government was heavily defeated. also overwhelmed by the scandal over inflated expense claims by MPs. controversy that Italians smile. British boys ask me how it is possible that Berlusconi could only stand for election with: national control of information, Alfano, Mills proved corruption, frequented by minors. I say that not only in Italy and 'presentable, but his coalition is likely to double that of rivals. is Once is not enough to mention the voting power of the media or the traditional anti-left Italian, I have to say that the majority of Italians (my constituents) like the authoritarian man, only to command, which clears the parliamentary and democratic systems of party and that is adored because cunning, amoral and wastes females, which might even be his daughters but nieces. here in this part of the Italians better not talk, do not understand.
I turn to the many people who have seized with enthusiasm and hope the experience of PD. attempt to rejuvenate the policy and make it more 'democratic, just and secular. and have been disappointed because they had high expectations. the seed democratic, 'but still there is not' easy to grow and reap the benefits. to rejuvenate the party apparatus is consensus and a positive election result. otherwise it is divided again over power and even bigger (if possible) to Berlusconi. need the help, patience and contribution of all. moreover, even the most critical, the "hard-core" can not fail to recognize as an attempt by the party late but remains by far the best example of good policy in Italy. not 'this time of the protest vote or abstention from disappointment, because it would give carte blanche to Berlusconi, who for me, and not just' a bad politician but ' too dangerous. and how to say those who know him well but he is not 'an employee (a few people in Italy can boast of these two qualities together) is not well.
not vote for him is not enough time, and 'necessary votargli against .
history teaches us that if the democratic progress, and civic and civil 'unavoidable,' but you can speed up or delay it. well, tomorrow assecondiamolo with one vote.
ps to be honest the British boys a few days ago I also asked (laughing): "but not to vote must do berlusconi? hard to organize feasts? "
I fear that the majority of Italians, accustomed believer and if necessary, will once again shrugged.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)